Guys: help me out, my salesmans are having a debate about kyo agains konica almost everyday. i need to know from real techs,who is the best in color reproduction...Kyo or Konica,your input will be appreciated...



DUMMIETEK...challenges "r" my business...

This message has been edited. Last edited by: DUMMIETEK,

Hands down it OKI for color! Take a look at the Okidata CX-3641, you can even request sample prints via the Okidata website. I always ask the DM what is more important to them "low-cost color, or outstanding color?" Kyocera has good inexpensive color, but nothing I have seen compares to the high end OKI, for high-quality output on all types of media.

jeff: the ? is... are this printers or copiers...reply...



DUMMIETEK...color is a prizm...

I have delt with Kyocera, monalta, konica, and OKI color. As of right now Kyocera has some color toner on the paper. Everyone else has color reproduction.

thanks mark. good input...



DUMMIETEK...subject resting in peace...

Nice Mark! I have to agree... I never liked the Kyocera Color boxes. The quality is just not there.

The old Minoltas(KM 1530 and 2230) had nice color and the Oki 3641 is way better than anything Kyocera puts out.

Thanks Mark.
I will be keeping a close eye on these then.

I agree Oki 3641 is awesome color and user does most of the work. Scanner not so good though

I haven't seen a 3641 but have a 3640 sitting in my showroom for several years now. While the output is outstanding the scanner is virtually useless from both a quality an practical standpoint.

This unit has never made it to a demo at a customer's office. The cost per print is way too high as was the cost of the machine. We only bought it because we were promised protected printer products would follow (which did NOT).

It would be a good proof printer or good for VERY short runs.

If anybody's interested in it make me an offer. I'd love to get it the f@ck out of here!